I want to know how I can use Reddit and Discord to grow my stream when they're usually all against self promotion.
I don't know the affinity of OBS and how it utilizes cores, which is probably where I could start. The Core i9-10900K managed a minimum 99th percentile of 43fps compared to between 40-41fps for most 3rd Gen Ryzen CPUs.
I know that streaming wants cores and threads...the more threads the better you can push the quality..the 10900k is "faster" and gets quite a but more fps in some games..if you are streaming and gaming all on one pc I actually think they would be about the same..you would lose a bit of performance on the 10900k but the lead it has in fps would probably make up for it..the 3950x would lose less performance but probably still be right around even with the 10900k fps wise...if you want max quality I would get the 3950x if you want max fps I would go with 10900k and even try nvencHow many cores are necessary(utilized) for 1080p 60fps medium encoder speed?What's the difference in more cores/threads versus speed for OBS?What can I get out of the 8 cores allocated in a 3950x vs 4 cores in the 10900k assuming the most demanding games will be using 6?Ok I was thinking that woul be the general trend. Intel has kept things roughly in line with current generation CPUs, but we're yet to see confirmed in-stock pricing. The 10900K also requires a new (Z490) LGA1200 motherboard, which Intel has indicated will remain compatible with Rocket Lake CPUs which are due later this year. What I care most about is what will makes Windows 10 and light apps, especially web browsers, run the best. – Let us know in the comments! However, adding hyper-threading to the entire stack will mean lower down the range things will be very interesting - certainly more interesting that what we're looking at here.The Core i9-10900K is certainly a gaming beast and has the measure of AMD in every single test, but often by very little, even at modest resolutions with a powerful graphics card. With a less powerful GPU or higher resolution, that difference would vanish.The really juicy part of this review is the content creation tests because this is where Intel will sink or swim with 10th Gen. The 10900K also requires a new (Z490) LGA1200 motherboard, which Intel has indicated will remain compatible with Rocket Lake CPUs which are due later this year. The landscape changes completely with multi-thread. However, the launch price of the Core i9-10900K is the same as the Core i9-9900K at just under $500, which means that for much of the product stack, you're getting more performance for your cash. A lack of innovation is certainly one criticism many will be making today and to a large extent that's true. Since having a family and having a small house, 5 years ago I gave up desktops and gaming at home. The new Intel Core i9-10900K is now official, sitting at the top of the lineup for the new Intel CPUs.
However, there was admittedly a bit of trouble hitting this frequency regularly thanks to some teething problems - the CPU did reach it, but only on very rare occasions and even having a simple monitoring software open in the background could affect it.I overclock each processor where possible so enthusiasts can see how much extra performance they can gain from doing this and you can see these results in the graphs.Sadly, you will not be able to use the new CPUs in older motherboards. A win is a win, though, but there was one CPU to better it - AMD's Ryzen 3 3300X, which I managed to overclock to 4.6GHz.Far Cry New Dawn is another fairly easy title to play at 1080p and just as I saw with Far Cry 5, the game does like non-hyper-threaded CPUs as well as high frequencies and lots of cores. Once overclocked, the Intel CPU was by far the quickest though, sitting more than 10 percent above the best AMD result.Blender's new test suite includes the tough BMW27 render benchmark and here, more cores are better, which unsurprisingly saw the 16-core Ryzen 9 3950X and 12-core Ryzen 9 3900X sit at the top of the graph. I understand the reasons because then it's all people will ever do. The same was true here with the Core i9-10900K with 10 cores offering significant gains over the eight-core Ryzen 7 3800X, but sat a way behind the 12-core Ryzen 9 3900X.The overclocks for the CPUs I've listed are:At 1080p Borderlands 3 isn't particularly taxing and even with an Nvidia RTX 2070 Super graphics card, there's a degree of stress put on the CPU so low latency and high frequencies come into play. So, what about those results? Not exactly demanding. Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Tumblr Pinterest Reddit WhatsApp. In other words, they’re actually about the same, and, perhaps even more worryingly, the Intel i9-10900K single-core performance is only a tiny bit better than the existing i9-9900K! It literally doesn't matter which high-end parts you choose because you're not utilizing any of them. 0 318 1 minute read. The example here sees you gain two cores and four threads for that same $500 price tag, albeit the usual USD 1K unit price, which will end up being a bit higher on etailer's shelves.I’m a technology journalist with a 25 year-long interest in computer hardware, gadgets and technology. However, even at these high frame rates, AMD really isn't far behind at all, with most CPUs sitting at a minimum 99th percentile of up to 74fps.