In this segment of AMD FX 4300 benchmark, AMD FX 4300 passmark is important testing software. The results below are given in seconds, so the lower the better.In this game, all CPUs performed the same way.Also on Rise of the Tomb Raider, the performance was the same on all CPUs.In this game, the FX-4300 was 16% slower than the FX-6350, 23% slower than the FX-8350, 6% faster than the A10-7870K, and was 33% slower than the Core i3-6100.Below you can see the memory configuration for each CPU.On the Work benchmark, the FX-4300 obtained similar performance to the FX-6350 and the A10-7870K, was 7% slower than the FX-8350, and was 17% slower than the Core i3-6100.We used the DivX converter, a tool included in the DivX package, in order to measure the encoding performance using this codec. Intel Core i7-9700F vs. AMD FX-4300 - Cinebench 11.5, Cinebench R15, PassMark and Geekbench 3 CPU Benchmark results The results are given in seconds, so the less, the best.Figure 1 unveils the box of the FX-4300 we used in our tests.The FX-4300 is an AMD processor that is on the market for a while but can be found nowadays as an inexpensive option to the most powerful models, like the FX-6350 and the FX-8350. The AMD FX-4300 is a budget quad-core processor which unlike its predecessor, the Bulldozer FX-4100, is based on the Piledriver micro-architecture which was released in Q4 of 2012.Its base clock speed of 3.8 GHz boosts to 4.0 GHz in turbo mode and with appropriate cooling can be overclocked to speeds of over 4.5 GHz. AMD FX 4300 Passmark. We put the 3.8 GHz AMD FX 4300 to the test against the 3.6 GHz FX 4100 to find out which you should buy. Ook derden kunnen uw internetgedrag volgen, zoals bijvoorbeeld het geval is bij embedded video's van YouTube.Tweakers is onderdeel van DPG Media. AMD FX 4-Core Black Edition Processors. It is very useful to measure the performance gain obtained by the presence of several processing cores while rendering heavy 3D images. Fire Strike runs a “heavy” DirectX 11 simulation. FX 4300 black edition is a 4 core desktop CPU based on AES technology. The results below are given in seconds, so the lower the better.Figure 2 shows the box contents: a manual, the CPU itself, a case sticker and a simple full-aluminum cooler.On the Cloud Gate benchmark, the FX-4300 was 25% slower than the FX-6350, 41% slower than the FX-8350, 8% slower than the A10-7870K, and was 28% slower than the Core i3-6100.The results below are expressed in frames per second.On the Sky Diver benchmark, the FX-4300 was 18% slower than the FX-6350, 26% slower than the FX-8350, 5% slower than the A10-7870K, and was 16% slower than the Core i3-6100.The best way to measure the performance of a CPU is by using real programs. We converted a 1 GiB, 1920x1080i, 23,738 kbps, .mov video file to a smaller 320×200, H.264, .MP4 file for viewing on a smartphone. AMD FX-4300 - Cinebench 11.5, Cinebench R15, PassMark and Geekbench 3 CPU Benchmark results Let’s see the results. Cookies kunnen worden gebruikt om op Tweakers advertenties te tonen en artikelen aan te bevelen die aansluiten bij uw interesses. Boxed Processor Find out details on key features, specifications, price, related products and more! AMD FX 4300 passmark is benchmark test software that is used for evaluating the performance of a computer. It uses a comprehensive range of diagnostic solutions. Let’s compare the main specs of the reviewed CPUs in the next page.Figure 4 shows the bottom of the CPU.Media Espresso is a video conversion program that uses the graphics processing unit of the video engine to speed up the conversion process. We ran three tests: Home, which includes web browsing, writing, light gaming, photo editing, and video chat tests; Creative, that includes web surfing, video editing, group video chat, video conversion, and gaming; and Work, which runs tasks such as writing documents, web browsing, spreadsheets, editing, and video chatting. The result is given as a score.Also, keep in mind that the overclocking capabilities of a CPU also depends on pure luck, since two CPUs of the same model can reach different clock rates.It may seem strange to review a CPU launched some time ago, but we were curious about if could this model be used for a budget work or gaming computer nowadays.However, if you are not that short on money, the FX-6350 or the Core i3-6100 are better options, delivering more performance for a little more bucks.In this test, the FX-4300 was 22% slower than the FX-6350, 30% slower than the FX-8350, 26% faster than the A10-7870K, and was 26% slower than the Core i3-6100.3DMark is a program with a set of several 3D benchmarks. To measure performance using this game, we ran the performance test included in the game, in 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) resolution and image quality configured as “medium” and MSAA off.The results below are expressed in frames per second (fps) and they are the mean between the three collected results.So, could the FX-4300 be a good choice? Sky Diver also measures DirectX 11 performance and is aimed at average computers.