Meanwhile the 9700K was managed a score of just over 1500 pts that placed it just behind the old 1800X and just ahead of the 8700K. Intel’s Core i9-9900K is faster at gaming than AMD’s Ryzen 9 3950X, but if gaming performance is what you’re after, you could save yourself quite a bit of money with an i7-9700K … (For login issues, please ctrl+F5)As for 1440p results, the top-end results are truncated by the GPU limitations imposed by a higher resolution, maxing-out the ceiling at 240FPS AVG. Two more physical cores come at the cost of four additional threads, which can post benefit in some thread-bound workloads – we’ll look at those in this content.We moderate comments on a ~24~48 hour cycle. AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3990X vs Intel Core i9-9900K: 11. Intel Core i7-9700K vs Core i9-9900K: Gaming Performance. We feel similarly about the 9700K. This is made obvious by our 7980XE at 4.6GHz outperforming CPUs like the 9700K at 5.1GHz.Thermals on the Intel i7-9700K are on the screen now. There’s a lot to go over, so we won’t waste much time going over the specs considering the CPUs have been up for pre-order now for 10 days now and nothing from the spec sheet is a mystery.The Core i7-9700K packs the same eight cores but can only process 8 simultaneous threads. At around $500, neither of these high-performance CPUs comes cheap, and … The Intel i7-8700K, the i7-9700K, and the i9-9900K. It comes clocked at the same 3.6 GHz base frequency while the all-core and single-core clock speeds decreased by a marginal 100 MHz. For anyone moving off of something like the i7-2600K or 4790K – present in this cart – you’re looking at noteworthy performance improvements. The 8086K is also not directly comparable in that its die is a different size, and so its dissipative properties are different than the 9700K and 9900K.
The L3 cache capacity is dropped down to 12 MB, too.The last rendering application we tested with is V-Ray and here the 9900K reduced the render time by 18%, taking just 62 seconds opposed to 76 seconds for the 2700X. The 9700K has stock base / boost clocks of 3.6 / 4.6 GHz and a single core boost of 4.9 GHz (compared to 3.6, 4.7 and 5.0 GHz for the flagship 9900K). It operates at a base frequency of 3.6 GHz but will boost as high as 4.7 GHz on all cores with a maximum single core frequency of 5 GHz. The trouble is that this is no longer a linear move. All the games were tested at 1080p using the highest quality preset. Hyper-Threading be damned. Joined Mar 7, 2013 Messages 30. smartphones laptops tablets News. en. Search. The 9700K ends up ranked alongside the 9900K and 7980XE. Much more detailed comparison of internal features of both processors is located in the CPUIDs section. This translates to almost identical single, quad and octa core performance between the 9900K and 9700K. Both boards were tested using DDR4-3200 CL14 memory and this same memory was used on all platforms without any manually-tuned timings. First world problems.F1 2018 produces extremely high framerates, something not as commonly found in other titles. Intel Core i9-10900K vs Intel Core i9-10900X: 9.
My opinion was about the experience of gaming at 1440p. AMD Ryzen 9 3900X vs Intel Core i9-9900K: 5. The same is true for the 8700K, which leverages its extra threads on the 6C/12T approach to lead the 9700K in each test, stock and overclocked. This is very different from how something like Premiere would handle encoding, so we’d advise not trying to extrapolate this performance to video applications.Windows 10 version 1803 was used for all testing with Windows Update disabled. Those hottest cores will restrict the rest of the cores.Unsurprisingly, we see mostly the same ranking order at 1440p. What is the difference between Intel Core i9-9900K and Intel Core i7-9700K? AMD Ryzen 9 3900X vs. Intel Core i9-9900K: Which High-End CPU to Buy? The 8700K at 5GHz ends up at 11.8 seconds, also functionally the same, although the stock 8700K ends up outside of error at 12.5 seconds per turn.Going to about 5GHz and 1.35V, the 9700K measures an average all-core load of 54 degrees over ambient, with power consumption at 188W and liquid thermals at about 10 degrees over ambient. Ryzen remains confined to the lower half of the charts as a result of the lower frequency, and this game does seem primarily bound by Amdahl’s Law.Blender gives us a look at rendering performance for a tile-based production 3D rendering workload. The L3 cache has been increased from the 8700K’s 12MB up to 16 MB and quite shockingly despite packing 2 more cores and 4MB more cache, the TDP rating remains at 95 watts which was already a suspiciously low rating for the 8700K. Overclocking the 2700 to 4.2GHz, similar to where a 2700X would land, puts it at 23 minutes for the Monkey Heads and 27 minutes for the logo. We'll explore the impact of this in a bit.As expected the 9900K and 9700K provide the highest out of the box single thread scores we’ve seen to date, easily breaking the 200 pts barrier thanks to a 5 and 4.9 GHz clock speed when using just a single core.Moving on to Corona and here we find a similar story, the 9900K reduced the render time by 20% from the 2700X, taking just 96 seconds. The 8-core Ryzen CPU was a fraction faster than the 9700K though.The PCMark 10 synthetic gaming benchmark relies heavily on both clock speed and core count, that said it’s interesting to see the 9900K only matching the 2700X here while the 9700K was able to edge ahead of the older 1800X.For testing we're using the MSI Z390 Godlike, but also used the Asrock Z390 Taichi Ultimate to confirm the results.