Both phones were set in performance mode and were running firmware as sampled by Samsung.It’s to be noted that the comparisons I’m making today are all on the new Android 9 firmwares – I don’t have updated figures for the Exynos S9 or the Snapdragon Note9, but have the latest numbers on the Snapdragon S9 and Exynos Note9, which should be identical to their sister series' counter-parts.In the Photo Editing test we see the new Exynos 9820 similarly performing almost twice as well as last year’s Samsung silicon. Samsung Exynos 9820 A 32-bit operating system can only support up to 4GB of RAM. It’s slightly higher than Huawei’s Kirin 980 chip which scored 309,628 on the Mate 20 Pro. The random read and write speeds are about the same on both devices. I set the quality to 1080p instead of the 1440p which would match the display resolution.Again, between these two devices, the Snapdragon 855 Galaxy S10+ has better performance. This time we’re pitting the new Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 against Samsung’s own new Exynos 9820. The fps stability was also 42% higher on the Snapdragon 855 model than the Exynos 9820 device.
7nm LPP EUV: 7nm LPP DUV: CPU big cores. The Exynos 9820 Galaxy S10, however, had an average of 25fps with 60% frame stability. This continues the pattern of the Snapdragon S10+ outperforming the Exynos S10.For the past few years, Samsung has shipped different processors in its flagship Galaxy S and Note series based on the region. It also allows you to run 64-bit apps. – Telephoto: 12MP PDAF, F2.4, OIS (45°)Playing the games, you can quickly notice the lower fps on the Exynos 9820 Galaxy S10. I almost couldn’t tell the fps stability was 4% lower on the Exynos 9820 device. Thus, we can attribute the difference in performance mainly to the SoC. The 35fps of the Exynos 9820 Galaxy S10 didn’t feel like it was lower than the Snapdragon 855 Galaxy S10+. 2x Samsung M4 @ 2.73GHz: 2x Samsung M4 @ 2.73GHz: CPU … It would jump from 12fps to 30fps while you are walking down a path then drop instantly. Exynos 9820 was announced on November 14, 2019. We’ll be seeing more of these benchmarks in the days to come as Samsung ramps up testing for its next flagship smartphone. Nintendo Gamecube and Wii emulation aren’t easy for Android devices, so testing Gamecube and Wii games is a great way to test the full power of a device.PCMark is a benchmark that tests the overall system performance by performing various productivity tasks on a device. Samsung Exynos 9810 Benchmark Scores and Performance of Samsung Galaxy S9+. It tests the UI performance, CPU performance, GPU performance, and memory performance. Samsung claims 20% better performance than the 9810, which looks to be reasonable.I kept things to a minimum and opted to just run PCMark and Speedometer 2.0 – both benchmarks are some of my favourite in terms of representing the true perceived performance and experience of a smartphone.
It tests at different display resolutions with different rendering APIs (Vulkan or OpenGL). It was a very smooth experience, as the numbers show. These results are surprising after seeing how well the Snapdragon S10+ performed compared to the Exynos S10 in the gaming tests and other performance benchmarks.Between the two devices, the obvious winner is the Snapdragon 855 Samsung Galaxy S10+. Everytime new flagship gets released it have the best benchmark score.
This Galaxy S10 Exynos 9820 benchmark scored 325,076 points on AnTuTu. While the new Exynos 9820 can’t keep up to the Snapdragon 855 in terms of performance, it’s no longer such a stark difference as we saw last year.The new Exynos 9820 performs significantly better than last year’s 9810.
Here you will find the pros and cons of each chip, technical specs and comprehensive tests in benchmarks like AnTuTu and Geekbench. For Fortnite, I would say the Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Samsung Galaxy S10+ is probably a better experience purely because of the lack of hitching.Unlike the last game, there is a significant difference in performance between the devices here.