The AMD A9-9425 has a Passmark performance index of 2795 which is relatively higher than the venerable Intel Core2Duo E8600 with a score of 2409, while the first-generation Intel Core i5 with 3980 is a much better performer. You can select more than one device.Stoney Ridge is the successor of the Carrizo architecture and the design is almost identical. That means the A9 is most suited for low demanding applications.Skylake replaces both Haswell and Broadwell and brings the same microarchitecture in every TDP class from 4.5 to 45 W. The extensive improvements of the Skylake design include increased out-of-order buffers, optimized prefetching and branch prediction as well as additional performance gains through Hyper-Threading. ssd boss.
AMD A9-9425 remove. CPUIDs The table below compares support for x86 extensions and technologies, as well as individual instructions and low-level features of the AMD A9-9410 and Intel Core i5-6200U microprocessors. Intel Core i5-8250U vs AMD A9-9410. ssd boss. 63 points. The manufacturer only reworked the Speed Shift technology for faster dynamic adjustments of voltages and clocks, and the improved 14nm process allows much higher frequencies combined with better efficiency than before.According to Intel, the new quad core models are up to 40% faster than their dual core predecessors.
Due to the reduced TDP and the same 14nm+ process, the long term performance and throttling behavior will be interesting and depending on the laptop design.
Home > Mobile chipset comparison > AMD A9-9425 vs Intel Core i5-8250U.
In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison.
Intel Core i5-8250U $ 309. Stoney Ridge is the designation for the smaller dual-core and single-core chip, while Bristol Ridge is the bigger quad-core chip with dual-channel memory controller. Optionally, the TDP can be lowered to 7.5 watts (cTDP down), reducing both heat dissipation and performance and allowing even more compact designs.In the following list you can select (and also search for) devices that should be added to the comparison. The multi-core performance on the other hand is limited by the single module and therefore only positioned of the entry level of 2018 CPUs. Also can someone give feedback on these specs: 7th Gen Dual Core A9-9400 Processor 2.40GHz, Turbo Boost up to 3.2GHz, 6MB Cache; NVIDIA Geforce GTX 960M with 4GB GDDR5 dedicated Video Memory 8GB DDR4 1600 MHz SDRAM (expandable up to 16GB); 1TB 5400rpm HDD; Thanks.
Compared to older Carrizo-L/Beema quad-cores, the APU should still perform pretty well. CPUBoss. The dual-core Kaby Lake processors announced in January should also support HDCP 2.2.The chip is manufactured in an improved 14nm process with FinFET transistors (14nm+), the same as the 7th Gen Kaby Lake processors. Acer Swift 5 Ultra-Thin & Lightweight Laptop 15.6” FHD IPS Touch Display in a thin .23" bezel, 8th Gen Intel Core i5-8265U, 8GB DDR4, 256GB PCIe NVMe SSD, Back-lit Keyboard, Windows 10, SF515-51T-507P More technical details are available in the following articles:AMD specifies the TDP of the A9-9410 with 15 Watts, but it can be configured between 10-25 Watts. I don't understand the check marks on bottom. Stoney Ridge is the designation for the smaller dual-core and single-core chip, while Bristol Ridge is the bigger quad-core chip with dual-channel memory controller. Therefore, the older 35 Watt quad-core models should be faster in applications that demand longer CPU loads.The TDP can be configured between 10-25 Watts, so there can be big performance differences under sustained workloads.Contrary to Skylake, Kaby lake now also supports H.265/HEVC Main 10 with a 10-bit color depth as well as Google's VP9 codec. This means the CPU is a good choice for thin and light notebooks, but also 15-inch devices with better cooling capabilities.Thanks to the high maximum clock of up to 3.5 GHz, the single-core performance should be pretty good. 0 Comments. Depending on the usage scenario, the TDP can vary between 7.5 (cTDP Down) and 25 Watts. General info Performance Memory Features. Thanks to optimized manufacturing processes and more aggressive Boost behavior, however, the clocks are a bit higher at the same power consumption. Acer Aspire 5 A515-55-56VK, 15.6" Full HD IPS Display, 10th Gen Intel Core i5-1035G1, 8GB DDR4, 256GB NVMe SSD, WiFi 6, HD Webcam, Fingerprint Reader, Backlit Keyboard, Windows 10 … The memory controller now also supports DDR4-RAM, in this case up to 2133 MHz. Sort; Compare; gpu boss.
0 Comments.
It's rumored that AMD is working on a new A9 7th Gen A9-9420, see how the leaked specs compare to the 3.3 GHz Intel 4590. This means the CPU is a good choice for thin and light notebooks, but also 15-inch devices with better cooling capabilities. Intel still specifies the TDP with 15 Watts, which is typical for ULV chips.
AMD A9-9425. Overall, however, performance per clock has been increased by only 5 to 10 percent (compared to Haswell) respectively under 5 percent (compard to Broadwell), which is quite modest for a new architecture ("Tock").AMD specifies the TDP of the A9-9425 with 15 Watts, but it can be configured between 10-25 Watts. 60. points.
AMD A9-9425 vs. Intel Core i5-3450 - Cinebench 11.5, Cinebench R15, PassMark and Geekbench 3 CPU Benchmark results 00.