Regardless of that, let's see how the two 28 core Ice Lake-SP Xeon CPUs stack against a single AMD EPYC 7742 CPU. NAS Parallel Benchmarks: EPYC 7601 vs. EPYC 7742 vs. Xeon Platinum 8280. 25 Comments . Since most CAE software (like LS-DYNA) is licensed by core, being able to use less cores results in a savings on the software licensing. In the x264 benchmark, the EPYC 7742 beat the single and dual Xeon Platinum 8280s by 28.45% and 26.72%, respectively. Please refresh the page and try again.Tom's Hardware is part of Future US Inc, an international media group and leading digital publisher. EPYC 7642/7742 vs. Xeon Platinum 8280 Performance With Intel-Recommended Benchmarks. The Scalable Video Technology (SVT) is highly optimized for Intel Xeon chips, so Intel is expected to have the upperhand. EPYC 7642/7742 vs. Xeon Platinum 8280 Performance With Intel-Recommended Benchmarks. Comparative analysis of Intel Xeon Gold 6254 and AMD EPYC 7742 processors for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Performance, Memory, Compatibility, Peripherals, Security & Reliability, Advanced Technologies, Virtualization.
Not included as part of our original EPYC 7742 / EPYC 7002 "Rome" Linux benchmarks was the NAS Parallel Benchmarks (NPB) developed by NASA. While skimming through the different system configurations, we noticed that the memory speeds weren't consistent between test systems. TotalCAE will continue to keep an eye out on the space.Managed HPC Clusters and Cloud for Engineers The posting has since been removed, but we managed to grab the test results.
25 Comments. So if simply going among the benchmarks recommended by Intel for system procurement, the EPYC 7642 and EPYC 7742 processors still easily win against the Xeon Platinum 8280 both in raw performance and even more so … Written by Michael Larabel in Processors on 27 October 2019. 7 Comments. Some criteria TotalCAE uses when evaluating new technology include:Based on our benchmarking of price/performance and criteria for new HPC technology, we still are favoring Intel Xeon based HPC systems for commercial HPC production systems. © The EPYC 7742 allegedly built the Linux kernel up to 53.86% faster than a Xeon Platinum 8280 and up to 5.64% faster than dual Xeon Platinum 8280s. It is used heavily for crash in the auto and aerospace industries. Intel All Set To Unveil & Detail Its Next-Gen Xe Graphics Next Month Taking the fight to the x265 battleground, the EPYC 7742 continued to dominate with performance margins over 29%.The EPYC 7742 allegedly built the Linux kernel up to 53.86% faster than a Xeon Platinum 8280 and up to 5.64% faster than dual Xeon Platinum 8280s. Every couple years there is a hot new technology that gets a lot of press, and clients are interested in learning more about how this technology may help them do more engineering. The AMD system tested was on Azure (HB120rs_v2) with AMD EPYC 7V12 64-Core Processors at 2.45 GHz.
car2car on Intel Xeon (Skylake) car2car on AMD EPYC (Rome) You can see that 120 cores of AMD EPYC takes a bit longer than 88 cores of Intel Skylake. Written by Michael Larabel in Processors on 27 October 2019. NY 10036.
Since most CAE software (like LS-DYNA) is licensed by core, being able to use less cores results in a savings on the software licensing. You will receive a verification email shortly.There was a problem. When it came to building the LLVM compiler, the EPYC 7742 reportedly did it up to 57.75% and 5.17% faster in comparison to single and dual Xeon Platinum 8280 chips, respectively.The EPYC 7742 also shined in the OpenSSL, Tensorflow and Sysbench benchmarks.The EPYC 7742's alleged dominance continued to be seen in rendering workloads. The car2car benchmark from topcrunch uses a NCAC minivan model created by Dr. Makino and analyses a head-on collision between 2 vehicles with around 2,500,000 nodes and elements.
The 64-core beast purportedly outperformed two Xeon Platinum 8280s by a margin of 19.3% and 6.9% in C-Ray and POV-Ray, respectively.Get instant access to breaking news, in-depth reviews and helpful tips.Thank you for signing up to Tom's Hardware. For this reason TotalCAE favors adopting stable and proven technologies in our HPC managed client clusters, and on-demand cloud solutions.If the users job crashes, has numerical errors, or there are other problems related to new technology, it doesn’t matter how good, fast or cheap benchmarking looked.