Nevertheless, the … It also has 35 MB of cache and a TDP of 65W. This thread is archived. save hide report. If you are gaming only, you might be better off with the Ryzen 5 3500X - Every now and then (Not very often, maybe every 2 or 3 hours) it does a hard stutter. That's if game really do benefit so much more from 8 cores versus 6 cores. Here the 3600 was almost 40% faster which is a massive performance uplift thanks to the use of SMT.Far Cry New Dawn is the least CPU demanding game we've tested so far, so unsurprisingly the 3500X doesn't suffer poor 1% low performance here, in fact it’s a little better than the 3600 in that regard. Build Help. Here the 3500X delivered a similar level of performance to a Core i7-7700K and Core i5-9400F, and although the average frame rate looks quite good it’s the 1% low performance that suffers.Shadow of the Tomb Raider isn’t quite as CPU demanding as the first two titles, and as a result the 3500X performs quite well. If we look at 1% low performance across the 7 games tested you get a good idea of how limited this CPU will eventually be.That’s all the blue bar graphs we have for you (almost! Even when it comes to gaming, the superior IPC of the 3500X’s Zen 2 cores can't make up for the lack of SMT support and to better illustrate that, here’s a look at some updated cost per frame graphs.If you haven't heard about the Ryzen 5 3500X until now it's likely because this CPU is mostly being sold and marketed to OEMs and system integrators, depending on where you’re located.
6 x 3.6GHz vs 4 x 3.7GHz So 6 core/12 threaded cpus will still hold up very well. When compared to the R5 3600 we’re talking about a 60% increase in render time, so creators on a budget are much better off with a Ryzen 2600 or similar.The advantage the Ryzen 5 3500X has over the similarly priced first and second-gen Ryzen parts (1600 and 2600 are 6-core/12-thread processors) is the improved single core performance offered by those Zen 2 cores.For those concerned about gaming performance not just today, but in a year or two, the 3500X makes even less sense. Again we see that the average frame rate performance is quite good, but it’s the 1% low performance that you should focus on here.At 1440p we see the same behavior, so for older and less demanding titles the six-threaded 3500X will be perfectly fine, no surprises there.© 2020 TechSpot, Inc. All Rights Reserved.Here the 3500X is comparable to the Core i5-9400F along with the first and second-gen Ryzen 5 parts.
Which still begs the question, how well does it perfom and what's changed from the R5 3600?ACO does become a little more GPU bound at 1440p and this helps the 3500X out as it’s not able to match the Ryzen 5 2600X, and really deliver similar performance to the R5 3600. Hey guys! The Ryzen 5 3600 is the better choice at $175 for most people trying to save some money. no comments yet. 81% Upvoted. Do you think it be a better idea to get a regular 3600 or a 3600X? The power draw numbers explain what's going on: System power (140w vs 146w) during Blender, Package Power (87w vs 87w) (presumably also during Blender). Overall performance was the same and not a great deal better than the 2nd-gen Ryzen.AMD’s SMT has always worked very well for decompression work, so the 3500X gets blown away as it can only compete with the Intel Core i5 processors in this test. They aren't retail in the USHey guys, im looking forward to build a new pc this christmas and im looking for a new cpu for gaming. As a reminder, we're using a high-end RTX 2080 Ti for testing.Thus in single-core Cinebench it’s basically on par with the Core i7-8700K, making it 25% faster than the R5 2600 and even 9% faster than the Core i5-9400F.The removal of SMT support means the 3500X loses quite a bit of its power efficiency. Should I get the 3600 with an aio, or get the 3700x with the stock cooler. Ryzen 3600 vs 3700X: Gaming, streaming, photo and video editing. Build Help. Ryzen 5 3600 vs 3600X. My 2600K lasted me 8 years before I really felt a need to upgradeI'm in the same boat with my i3 3220 and looking into a new amd cpu.The way I see it : go for 3600 if you plan to upgrade CPU in the next 3 years, if not go for 8 cores.I would get 8 core just because next gen consoles will all have 8 zen2 cores.I think we can take AC:Origins as a good example for future games, even past the next console generation.I believe that's the leak so far. The Ryzen 3600 looks pretty solid for it's price, benchmarks show it's only slightly weaker than its 8 core counterpart. Ryzen 5 3500x V/S Ryzen 5 3600. Be the first to share what you …
Hitman 2 played well on the 3500X, certainly well enough despite the 1% lows taking a bigger hit than what you’ll experience on a modern 8 and 12-thread processor. 45.95% faster CPU speed? In V-ray benchmark we see that the 3500X was 6% slower than the old Ryzen 5 1600 and almost 20% slower than the R5 2600.Time for some game benchmarks and we’ll start things off with Assassin's Creed: Odyssey at 1080p using the very high quality settings. Ryzen 3600 vs 3700x.
Archived. Yet again, power consumption is hardly a concern here as 141-watt total system load for a core-heavy workload is nothing.The 1% low performance was improved by 11% with the R5 1600 and 14% for the R5 2600. We’re still waiting for FOUR cores to become obsolete. spend the saved money on better ram or gpuI bought a wraith prism (from a guy with a 3700X) to put on my daughter’s 3600 cuz that mirage effect looks cool.Not to mention it’s a much better cooler then the wraith stealth. share. Close.