Shares. Do note that some platforms do not support the new PCIe gen 4, and therefore will cap out around 3400-3500MB/s.First up is the Sequential read test, which every manufacturer touts as the "up to" speed, but in reality, you never see this in everyday usage, but I digress. This is usually an area where OPTANE or a 3DXPoint storage solution rules, but the PCIe 4 drive does well here.Here we see the 3600XT and 3800XT retake the top spot. But the gap is closing enough that I think any gamer who does not consider Ryzen 3000, let alone the new XT chips, are looking past some excellent value prospects. Here once again, we see the same staggering of performance. As you can see here, the turbo or boost frequency was increased on each chip the same as we mentioned previously.AMD is proud of the fact that the XT processors are drop in compatible with any current Ryzen 3000 compatible motherboard. This is not a deal-breaker, but something to have in mind as it will be a heavier load on your cooler until this is resolved.Loading each CPU up with a full burn-in FPU load, and we see the gaps start to widen. Things did shuffle for this one.WebXPRT is a browser-based test, and we like this test as this is one of the areas not many think to test. Cookies kunnen worden gebruikt om op Hardware Info advertenties te tonen en artikelen aan te bevelen die aansluiten op je interesses. The 3800XT takes the top spot formally held by the Ryzen 3100. The 3800XT still readily beat the 9900K, and the 3600XT outpaces the 10600K.Blender once again shows similar scaling with the 3900X/XT beating the 10900K.
Meer informatie hierover vind je op PCIe gen 4 is still here, and all other aspects are identical between the XT and X series CPUs.The XT variants of CPU are priced at the same level of the X versions, which means the X variants will either see an EOL or a price adjustment to put pressure on the Intel competing stack further.Let's push ahead and check out the marketing AMD has shown for these new XT CPUs, and then we will test their performance claims in our lab.The Ryzen 5 3600XT has the full-size square box due to it shipping with the Wraith Spire cooler, but otherwise is identical to our 3600X packaging.The Ryzen 7 3800XT comes in a slimmer packaging profile allowed by the omission of the cooler, so all you have is the instructions and CPU.The Ryzen 9 3900XT also comes in a thinner profile package; however, it is a bit nicer presentation. It can also be used as a standalone application, which is what we opted for to best control variables.Corona Render shows the 3900XT now leading the 10900K, whereas the 3900X was matched with it. Time will tell how these models work together.Here we see the process technology claims from AMD along with their stated performance uplifts and performance leadership claims versus the competing parts. With the release of the 10th gen Comet Lake series of CPU from Intel, we knew it would not be long until we saw a response from AMD. One note is the essentials tests that deal with application loading and other tasks that seemed to provide the XT CPUs a rough experience. Much to my surprise, though, the 10600K outpaces the 3600XT while the 9900K falls behind the 3600XT. The 3600XT falls behind the 10600K by a slight amount.The nT performance puts as back into more of the same as we see the 3900XT topping the chart and keeping the 10900K at bay. These are tiny files at a low queue depth.
This is likely the right choice overall with the stock cooling solution not always being sufficient for maximum turbo levels, and pushing users to equip better aftermarket coolers ensures better boosting performance.All of the X vs. XT variant of CPU have the same base clock; only the turbo is bumped for the XT models. The 3900XT exhibits a substantial gain over the 3900X and the 3800XT hitches a ride with a close trailing position.
However, I am sure there will be UEFI optimizations and releases coming soon to make them work better.
The 3900XT are right on the heels of the 3100 and 3300X.The MP600 tends to do much better here with random writes.