It is manufactured in an improved 14nm FinFET process (14nm+) at Intel. Intel has long enjoyed the uncontested lead in this segment, but while AMD's first-gen Threadripper lineup disrupted the status quo, the Threadripper 3000 lineup destroyed it.When comparing AMD vs Intel CPU power and heat, the former's 7nm process node makes a huge difference. Intel Core i7 3517U vs AMD A10 5745M ... AMD A10 5745M : Join the discussion. Until then, the company is stuck on the same Skylake microarchitecture that's most significant changes have come as hardware-based silicon fixes for its plethora of security vulnerabilities, plus adding more cores.There are a few major underlying technologies that dictate the potency of any chip. That might not matter much, though, because Intel has been in its own perpetual shortage for more than a year.
That means promising new Intel microarchitectures can only ride on smaller processes, like 10nm, leaving the company woefully unprepared for its prolonged issues productizing 10nm products.Regardless of whether or not AMD can lay claim to developing the 7nm node to wrest the lead from Intel, the company had the foresight to contract with TSMC to gain access to a superior process node technology. In either case, you still won't achieve the high frequencies you'll see with Intel processors (5.0 GHz is still unheard of with an AMD chip without liquid nitrogen cooling), but you do get a free performance boost.Regardless, right now AMD has had far fewer security holes to plug. It's also noteworthy that AMD often provides more cores and threads at any given price point, so there's less of a chance of utterly erratic performance if you're running chat clients, web browsers, and other tasks in the background while gaming.
That lends the designs a comfortable lead, provided they're combined with a decent design.When it comes to AMD vs Intel mid-range and budget CPUs, the Core i5 and i3 families do battle with AMD's Ryzen 5 and Ryzen 3 processors. The table below compares support for x86 extensions and technologies, as well as individual instructions and low-level features of the AMD A10-8700P and Intel Core i7-6500U microprocessors. Those factors combine to make Intel a notorious power guzzler.In contrast, AMD only offers integrated graphics on its APU models, which means you'll need a discrete graphics card (GPU) for any chip that has more than four cores (or costs more than ~$150). It also grants a level of scalability that Intel might not be able to match with its new mesh interconnect inside its HEDT chips, and it undoubtedly takes the lead over Intel's aging ring bus in its desktop processors.AMD also recently introduced its Ryzen 9 3900XT, Ryzen 7 3800XT and Ryzen 5 3600XT processors, but aside from minor 100 MHz to 200MHz clock speed improvements, those chips don't have any real new features to set them apart from the existing chips. When you compare AMD vs Intel CPU specifications, you can see that AMD offers more cores and/or threads at every price point, more cache, support for … Referring back to our previous category, pricing is the ultimate measuring stick, and AMD pulls off a few key wins in the mid-range where most of us shop, but Intel's Core i5-10600K serves up a compelling lead in its price bracket, making it the most attractive gaming chip for around $260.That opens up a tremendous amount of threaded performance at every point in AMD's stack, and Intel's Comet Lake price adjustments obviously deal the resale value on older Intel chips yet another blow. Those extra cores equate to big performance-per-dollar wins in almost every type of threaded workload, like rendering and video processing.The benefits of TSMC's 7nm node means AMD can build cheaper, faster, and denser chips with more cores, and all within a relatively low power consumption envelope. AMD A10-9620P vs Intel Core i7-7500U vs Intel Core i7-7660U.
In tandem with AMD's Precision Boost and innovative thread-targeting technique that pegs lightly-threaded workloads to the fastest cores, AMD exposes near-overlocked performance right out of the box. Compared to the old Skylake Core i7-6500U (2.5 - 3.1 GHz), the i7-7500U clock speed is up to 400 MHz higher.The AMD A10-9620P is a mid-range APU of the Bristol Ridge series (7th generation of APUs) with 4 CPU-cores (two Excavator modules) clocked at 2.5 - 3.4 GHz. This market segment comprises the most substantial portion of both AMD and Intel's sales, so pricing and value here are paramount.