Title says it all. I've to choose between R5 2600 (100€) and R5 3600 (180€): relevant PC specs: RAM: 32 GB 3600 MHz.
This data is significantly more GPU limited with the GeForce GPUs. The games used should also cover most performance scenarios. It’s also interesting to note that although slower for both the average and 1% low performance, the Ryzen 5 2600 sees just a 23% variation between the two metrics whereas the 3300X sees up to a 29% difference, suggesting once more that the experience won’t be as smooth.It's not until we tested at 1440p with ultra graphics that the game starts to become a little more GPU bound, so we’re now seeing similar performance from the 3300X and 3600 with the RTX 2070 Super.We find more interesting Far Cry New Dawn results at 1080p when increasing the preset quality to ‘Ultra’. I've asked and looked around and I … On average, as long as the 3600 isn't being bottlenecked elsewhere, you can expect an improvement of around 10 to 20 FPS for most games if you upgrade from a 2600.And if you're a hobbyist who just has some extra money to burn on a new CPU, stop reading this and go ahead and pick up a Ryzen 5 3600 or 3600X and have some fun.
As a result we see very little performance difference between the tested processors. At least until fourth-gen desktop Ryzen is released. 2 x 8 GB Kingston HyperX Predator DDR4-3200 CL16. AMD’s Ryzen 5 3600 is a 6-core, 12-threaded processor which succeeds the Ryzen 5 2600 improving upon it by 13% in terms of overclocked performance. The 2600 and 2700 are pretty much the only Ryzen CPUs with PB2 that benefit in all workloads from a manual OC. The 3300X is only 5% faster than the 2600 and ~2% slower than the 3600 as we become more GPU limited. TL;DR: I'd like having results from gaming benchmarks between R5 2600 and R5 3600. Then for RX 580 owners you’re looking at a 7% increase on average for the 1% low performance.Even with the RX 580 we see that the 3600 is up to 9% faster, something we’ve not seen in the other games tested, though none of the other titles saw frame rates exceed 150 fps.We’ve included this title deliberately as it represents the kind of performance you’re likely to see in older games. With the RTX 2080 Ti the 3600 is just 4% faster than the 3300X when comparing averages, but 14% faster when comparing 1% lows. Western Digital Blue 1 TB 2.5" Solid State Drive. The 3600 is a few percent faster with the RTX 2080 Ti and then identical performance is seen with the 2070 Super.Finally, here’s a look at the 1440p ultra data, probably the most realistic scenario for someone rocking a high-end graphics card like the RTX 2070 Super or RTX 2080 Ti.
Monitor: 1440p 144 Hz. Ersteller des Themas MB7; Erstellungsdatum 27. We’ve found in the past that AMD’s drivers produce more overhead, so perhaps that’s what we’re seeing here. The 3600 is in competition with Intel’s 6-core i5-9600K. We see a big hit to performance by simply increasing the resolution, now at 1440p using the ‘High’ quality setting, the RTX 2080 Ti has dropped down to under 200 fps with the Ryzen 5 3600. AMD continues to push the multi-core performance envelope: benchmarks show that the 3600 has a 27% overclocked 64-core lead over the 9600K but that the Scythe Fuma Rev. Of course, this is because the game is more GPU limited at the higher resolution.In all this data the 3300X was up to 11% slower than the 3600 with similar margins between the average and 1% low data.