Moreover, the 2666 configuration is now just 3% slower when comparing the average frame rate.We've had access to several new Z490 boards and only Asus seems to adhere to these limits with MSI, Asrock and Gigabyte all running without power limits with only one or two exceptions on mATX and Mini-ITX boards. Once installed, these CPUs will be able to perform admirably in games and when processing intense loads from productivity suites. Granted a 5% increase is pretty small for a 20% boost in memory frequency, but still that’s more that what we saw in Cinebench. The Ryzen 5 3600X sports faster clock speeds than the Ryzen 5 3600 and is boxed with a better stock cooler. At stock, we found the 3600X to offer a very mild performance increase (5… 2 x 8 GB Kingston HyperX Predator DDR4-3200 CL16. In Techpowerup's tests of the Ryzen 2600 and 3000 series with a far more powerful GPU, the difference isn't nearly as big as what OP is stating here. It also allows you to run 64-bit apps. $10 sure, but not more than that.Even when it comes to power draw there’s virtually no difference.
Scythe Fuma Rev. AMD Ryzen 5 2600 / AMD Ryzen 5 3600. It's legitimately difficult to recommend anything else. Speaking of heat, let's look at how the 3600X compares with its 95w Wraith Spire box cooler to the 3600 with the 65w Wraith Stealth, when running Blender. When using the same memory as the Ryzen 5 3600 the 10400 was 8% slower for compression work and then 12% slower with DDR4-2666 memory.© 2020 TechSpot, Inc. All Rights Reserved.Moreover, when jumping up to 1440p which we feel is a more realistic scenario with an RTX 2080 Ti, the 10400 and 3600 are indistinguishable in terms of gaming experience. I can't decide if I want to grab the 3700x or just hold off since my 1700 does everything just fine.
Here it was 11% faster than the Core i5-10400 and 20% faster when comparing the Intel processor with DDR4-2666 memory. We’re also looking at virtually no difference between the DDR4-2666 and 3200 configurations.Granted, as we move to 1440p the results become far more GPU bound and as a result the 3600 and 10400 deliver identical performance when both are configured with DDR4-3200 memory. Im about to upgrade my 1600 to get a new 3600, 3600X or 3600XT (i will give the RAM, CPU and mainboard to my father and probably get a 550 motherboard to be able to upgrade to one of the Zen3 chips). Both CPUs were tested at bone stock settings and memory is set to XMP 3200CL16 profile.Those 0.1% low improvements are insane, i wasn't really tempted to upgrade from my 1700 before but this has me tempted.AMD Ryzen 5 2600 / AMD Ryzen 5 3600Sapphire Pulse RX 580 (OC'd to 1450 core/2150 mem)This is where I stand as well. Game settings. The Ryzen 5 1600 is one of four new Ryzen 5 processors released this month. -- that doesn’t justify the 25% price increase.We haven’t discussed manual overclocking. Temperatures were exactly the same and clock speeds were also basically identical, in fact the R5 3600 maintained a slightly better PBO frequency in our test, though we wouldn’t read into that too much, there’s a good chance if we ran this enough times with enough CPUs we’d find that on average there’d be no difference in operating frequency.AMD explains how they calculate the TDP for Zen 2 processors in the review guide, but it doesn’t help address the issue as there are variables we don’t know, such as the optimal operating temperatures for each part. It is worth the extra money over R5 2600 IMO. R5 3600 is the clear winner. B. If you don't mind paying slightly more, it's the better choice overall.You sacrifice very little by going with the Ryzen 5 3600. It has faster clock speeds from the factory (with a higher TDP) and comes rocking a better stock cooler. Compared against the 3600X, this CPU is only slightly slower, which you can address with overclocking, and it still comes with a stock cooler.The Ryzen 3600X is ideal for those who don't mind paying a little bit extra for higher factory-set clock speeds and a better stock cooler. As such the 3600 gets the 65w Wraith Stealth and the 3600X the 95w Wraith Spire.Moving on to Adobe Premiere we see the biggest performance gain yet as the 3600X reduced the render time by 5%, taking 513 seconds opposed to 539 seconds. It’s important to note that worst case the Intel CPU was still spitting out over 180 fps at all times in our test, so how much that 20% margin matters here is debatable.Battlefield V shows the Core i5-10400 performing very well in games, and with the same-spec memory it roughly matches the Core i7-8700K, making it around 5% faster than the 3600 when comparing the average frame rate. All configs were tested with a GeForce RTX 2080 Ti, 32GB of DDR4-3200 CL14 memory and a Corsair Hydro H150i Pro 360mm AIO liquid cooler.As you just witnessed, when it comes to gaming performance the Core i5 processor is roughly on par with the 3600, while for productivity tasks AMD's offering is often up to 10% faster while consuming a similar level of power. You can basically swap the coolers around and reverse the results. So long as you pair it with one of these motherboards.The Ryzen 5 3600X is ideal for anyone wanting to pick up a great mid-range CPU, which is clocked higher than the 3600 from the factory, and bag a decent stock cooler in the process.