There were a number of trends worth pointing out.This next table breaks it down by graphics card:The only upside to running at 8C/16T over 16C/16T would seem to be power consumption. To summarize, anything that wanted serious throughput, Game Mode was not the right mode to be in. But anyone could have told you that.The next element is the single threaded tests in the suite. The individual game numbers are matched similarly - on the right at 1080p at 16C/16T, we get an ~0.1% difference in the results for Game Mode compared to Creator mode… AMD Ryzen Master gives users advanced, real-time control of system performance. WinRAR is a known memory-loving test, so Game Mode picked up a 3% win, and the web benchmarks that are variable threaded such as WebXPRT also picked up a 9% win. Interestingly, the results for almost all benchmarks were lower in 8C/16T mode over 16C/16T mode.
That was enough for the 3900X to perform better than the 3700X as one might expect.
What does Game mode do? Enabling ‘Game Mode’ and rebooting a system will basically disable half of the CPU cores. Every AMD Ryzen processor is multiplier-unlocked from the factory, so you can personalize performance to your taste. The primary difference between the $500 Ryzen 7 1800X, $400 Ryzen 7 1700X, and $330 Ryzen 7 1700 are their clock speeds. AMD’s solution worked as you could run Threadripper in creator mode for when you wanted to have all cores active for peak performance or you could disable half of the chip to likely have better gaming performance. Before we had a +26.5% gain in 99th percentile numbers at 1080p, but now this is only +14.3%. The flagship 1800X’s base … Despite moving down to a single die worth of cores, it would appear that having the raw cores at the disposal counteracts most of the cross communication losses, especially if each die of cores preferentially communicates with its own DRAM channels where possible.Now let us break it down by game tests. So, we headed into Ryzen Master and enabled ‘Game Mode’ on the 3900X processor for the first time.Enabling ‘Game Mode’ on the Ryzen 9 3900X processor gave us a 4.5% performance improvement than running this game title in ‘Creator Mode’ as you can see from the chart above. And thats when the magic happend. As the processor manufacturers have been rapidly increasing core counts that hasn’t directly translated into better performance.
Disable Precision Boost = EDC information is not available in Ryzen Master.
The individual game numbers are matched similarly - on the right at 1080p at 16C/16T, we get an ~0.1% difference in the results for Game Mode compared to Creator mode, but on the left at 8C/16T we see an average loss of 3% for some of the tests. But if you like to game at decent framerates then in the new Ryzen Master software there is a new function called Game mode.
It’s highly likely that this game title doesn’t react well to higher core count processors and will be something we’ll continue to investigate.When we ran other game titles with ‘Game Mode’ enabled on the 3900X we found that performance dropped. As stated before, Agisoft goes up 1%, and perhaps surprisingly our Compile benchmark goes down 14%. At just $198 the 2600 isn’t just a great gaming CPU, with serious multi-threaded chops, it’s also an incredibly good-value chip too.
When AMD first introduced their Ryzen Threadripper series of processors in 2017 with up to 16-cores and 32-threads on the Threadripper 1950X processor they quickly found out that poor thread scheduling can hurt game performance. Agisoft is probably a hollow victory as overall that test only gains by 1%.If a user wants to use Threadripper to play certain games when using an AMD card, they should be in Game Mode. And this morning I changed the Ryzen Master to gaming mode and run userbenchmark tests. The purpose of this document is to provide detailed information on the various performance
In the pure CPU benchmarks, at 16C/16T some benchmarks like Dolphin had a +33% increase, but at 8C/16T it is only a +9% increase.In this review, we posted every graph with both the Creator Mode results (as default) and the Game Mode results (as 1950X-GM) for the Threadripper 1950X. In our test suite, I earmarked 19 different tests that are designed to scale with thread count, and the results ranged from +1% (Octane) down to -48% (Corona) and -45% (LuxMark). Game mode will set up …
This means the Threadripper 1950X would become an 8-core, 16-thread processor and the 4+4 CCX configuration on one die was better for gaming than having the 4+4+4+4 CCX configuration on two dies. The choice was up to the user and what isn’t there to like about that.This is the first time we’ve seen an AMD Ryzen processor benefit from a mode that many believed to just the AMD Ryzen Threadripper series. One would have thought that the faster memory latency of Game Mode might counteract the lack of threads, especially when the L3 victim cache is of little use, but overall it would seem that our compile test likes the threads instead.