It's no secret that AMD is experiencing a surge in both popularity and sales, but we've just seen some analysis that really puts AMD's recent victories into perspective.©Future US, Inc. 11 West 42nd Street, 15th Floor,New York,NY 10036.AMD Ryzen 3000 is killing it in salesGet the best tech deals, reviews, product advice, competitions, unmissable tech news and more!There was a problem. Beat out intel by a good 50%. Then AMD stagnated as they didnt release anything for 5 years and they did refreshes of their APU line,, and intel briefly came ahead with the HD 530 in skylake and onward. Eyefinity was really good in its time.That is a factor that is pretty important right now. You will receive a verification email shortly. Intel beats AMD and Nvidia to crowd-pleasing graphics feature: ... Chris Hook, about the discussion Intel generates with Reddit AYA and community feedback and who ends up with this information. Let me grab my popcorn brbEven if NV have the top selling this, and intel the top selling that - it is a fragmented ecosystem, that may soon be overwhelmed by an ecosystem that can no longer be ignored by coders.It runs fine on NVidia cards, but on Radeon cards you have problems like text not rendering, weird wireframing around objects, and just bad performance in general.
Currently, i run VR, multiple PC games all at same time on my rig, zero issues.Drivers are stable without issues most of the timeActually like the driver interface but its a moot point without overall driver stabilityDriver installation extremely easy that a caveman could do it.One thing no one here has mentioned but some might find the information useful: if you do data science then Nvidia is the obvious choice as well.
And despite it's lacking visuals (doesn't have DX12 if i am not mistaken) it also thus beat Vega at the high end. BSoD Gaming made a comparison video comparing AMD vs Nvidia gpu's in emulation. With how far behind AMD is performance wise I'd be surprised if they beat the 3080 non-ti convincingly. AMD is 2 years behind Nvidia.. Claims are that the new AMD GPUs will beat the 2080 ti, which will likely be a solid 2 year old card before AMD releases so called "BigNavi". I was expecting AMD to lag behind in OpenGL but take the lead in Vulkan. The 1660 lineup are fantastic when it comes to value, especially the 1660S, but amd is really holding it down when it comes with the 5700 lineup, outside of some rare driver issues of which they've been fixing.I built a Ryzen rig.. and ended up pairing it with 570...I've had Geforce cards prior, but the 570 was best bang for my buck. A few more years pass and RTcores are now present in Nvidia's entire GPU lineup from the high end to the low. With both a die shrink and a new architecture, there will probably be a large performance improvement on the upcoming Nvidia GPUs. Plus AMD is apparently getting their drivers fixed - at least for Windows?AMD has never overtaken Nvidia when it comes to GPUs. AMD has been beating Intel in desktop sales for a while now, but some graphs put together by Reddit user ingebor really put that into perspective. Sadly it looks like Nvidia is beating AMD in Vulkan too which is shocking since AMD has been pushing the new api hard and claiming superiority due to hardware support.However, the opposite holds true.
and a medium performance "Navi" with a low power consumption would rock hard the PC, consoles and mobile sector well!?