According to the accuser, she then left Wilson’s home to return to the bar. The pair left the nightclub at 12:15 AM. Meaning, that they would have had to leave Mr. Wilson’s home at 12:25 AM to get back to the club at the time they did; heavily suggesting that only five minutes were spent in Mr. Wilson’s home as was said in his testimony.Nevertheless, the jury, mostly comprised of female jurors, found Albert Wilson guilty of one count of rape. Douglas County District Judge Sally Porkony, presiding over the case, sentenced him to a little over twelve years in prison.Wilson’s state-appointed defense attorney, Forrest Lowry, argued that because there is no DNA evidence of penetration; that the surveillance video shows that she was not led out by Mr. Wilson nor was drunkenly stumbling and that only five minutes could have been spent at Mr. Wilson’s home, there is nothing to corroborate the accuser’s story that Wilson had forced sexual intercourse with her. Now the nation is in an uproar, demanding justice for Wilson.
The accuser, a then 17-year old high school student, was not asked for identification by the club at all.Surveillance footage of the nightclub did not show the accuser stumbling or being led away by Mr. Wilson as she had testified. Surveillance video from the bar showed the victim being led out about 12:10 a.m. by a man in a sweater with bright colors. The victim’s cousin then contacted one of her sorority members who was trained to deal with victims of sexual assault. This offense is a rape.”Albert N. Wilson was sentenced to 12 years in prison in Kansas after he was found guilty of raping a minor in the town of Lawrence on September 10, 2016. His defense attorney stated that Mr. Wilson wanted to become a sports journalist the night before the alleged incident and was dreaming of graduating from Kansas University.When walking back to the nightclub from Mr. Wilson’s home, surveillance video shows that he and the accuser were not holding hands this time.The accuser testified at trial that she was drinking before going on the dancefloor. A second charge of sexual assault resulted in a hung jury.
In January 2019, Wilson was found guilty of rape by a jury of nine women and three men.
She met her cousin there, who she originally came to the club with, and the following day she proceeded to go to a hospital for a sexual assault examination.Albert was a Wichita Southeast High School football player who attained an associate degree from a community college. The victim told the court during the trial that she told her cousin that she was too tired to talk about the incident and went to bed. She testified that Wilson then led her out of the bar, drunkenly stumbling, to his house a couple of blocks away.On January 10th, 2019, a mostly female jury found Albert N. Wilson, a 23-year-old University of Kansas student, guilty of raping a woman he met at a nightclub near campus.Google Maps states that it takes roughly five minutes to reach Mr. Wilson’s home from the Hawk nightclub by foot.
Albert N. Wilson, now of Wichita, was charged with two counts of rape; jurors convicted him of one count but failed to reach an agreement on the second count.
He then decided to go see what his friend needed.
She couldn’t be in the gym during assemblies anymore.”Wilson was found guilty after the jury deliberated for six hours. Wilson was given the reported “lowest end of what’s called for by Kansas sentencing guidelines for rape.” Video surveillance showed the two engaging with each other on the dancefloor, and only stayed at Wilson’s apartment for five minutes before returning to the bar.
His friends and family described him to be a “selfless young man with good character, a good work ethic, and big goals for his life.”At 12:15 AM, surveillance video shows Mr. Wilson and his accuser walking down 14th street to his home, two blocks away, while holding hands. While Judge Pokorny said to Wilson, “You and your family may not agree with the verdict, but the verdict came back as guilty. Wilson testified that on the dance floor, he and the accuser were consensually kissing and touching each other in a somewhat sexual manner. The District Judge denied the request.The prosecution’s case solely relied on hearsay, circumstantial evidence, and the flimsy testimony of the accuser which has been heavily put to question as suggested by Wilson’s defense attorney.Mr. The sorority member did say that the victim looked “disheveled” and had been crying.Here’s what you need to know:Wilson was identified by police as the suspect in the rape after officers tracked down the identity of the real person in the ID that Wilson used to get into the bar.The victim’s mother testified during the trial that her daughter had suffered serious emotional problems after the incident.
The victim lived in the Kansas City area and was a high school student at the time.Wilson maintained during the trial that the pair had had consensual relations. He then transferred to Kansas University.
Wilson stated that to the contrary of his accuser’s testimony that she stumbled out of the nightclub drunkenly, she, in fact, stumbled on a crack in the sidewalk while walking back to his home. Albert N. Wilson attended a bar with a friend and met a girl who was visiting a family member who attended KU. The sorority member who spoke with the victim said that she knew the victim had been drinking but said that she didn’t seem drunk later in the night. Footage also showed that the two were in Wilson’s home for approximately five minutes before returning to the nightclub.Mr.