It’s possible last time there was an update running in the background that threw this data off by a small margin.By simply enabling enhanced multi-core we see the Cinebench R20 multi-core score increase from 3566 up to 3836 pts, an easy to achieve 8% performance boost. AMD Ryzen 7 3700XがIntel Core i9-9900よりも優れている理由は何ですか？16.13%速いCPUクロック速度? The cooler issue can be solved for just $30, but when you add in the price of the motherboard it starts to get more expensive. As far as we're aware no retailer has received stock and we’ve been told there will be no stock available in Q2. That being the case, I can also see how buying a processor with 25% less cores for roughly the same price might not be the wisest of investments moving forward. Without any power limits in place the Core i5-10600K pushed total system usage to 198 watts, slightly higher than the 9700K and a 12% increase over the 8700K. AMD Ryzen 7 3700X とAMD Ryzen 5 3600 の比較を表示します。CPUランキング形式で、総合評価と各性能を比較してみましょう。32ビットのオペレーティング・システムは4GB以内のRAMだけをサポートすることができます。64ビットは増加したパフォーマンスを与えて、4GB以上をみておきます。
When compared to Ryzen, it was 11% faster than the Ryzen 7 3700X at 1080p, which is a reasonable performance uplift. As a result the 10600K was just a few frames slower than the 10700K and 10900K, while it beat the 3700X by a 5% margin.For those of you exclusively gaming, I can see how the Core i5-10600K makes sense. That is a fairly large temperature increase for just a 13 watt power increase, but of course this stuff does scaling in a linear fashion.Moving on to 7-zip, the 10600K again matched the 8700K in decompression performance, making it 20% slower than the 3600 and almost 40% slower than the 3700X.Anyway, in terms of performance the 10600K is very similar to the 8700K and that means that while it's able to match the average frame rate of the 9900K, 10700K and 10900K, it was about 8% slower when looking at the 1% low data.Testing with Far Cry New Dawn saw the 10600K deliver 121 fps on average and that made it 8% slower than the 10700K, but 4% faster than the 8700K. Testing with Far Cry New Dawn at 1080p sees a frame rate boost of 12% and this was enough to put the 10600K on par with the 10700K and 10900K.On the other hand, the Core i5-10600K has the potential to deliver 10700K and 10900K-like performance at an even cheaper price point. There is a reasonably large difference in 1% low performance though as the Core i5 was 12% slower than the 10700K. So while we'll be using the default clock multiplier tables, none of the Intel CPUs are adhering to any power limits. However, for those of you seeking maximum frame rates in games, while also being somewhat budget conscious, the Core i5-10600K might have something to offer here.Increasing the resolution further increases the GPU bottleneck and now the 10600K, 3700X, 3600 and a bunch of other processors all deliver virtually identical performance.For this review we’re going to look exclusively at results for Intel CPUs that aren’t power limited, so no TDP limited testing. We compare the AMD Ryzen 7 3700X with the AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X with a wide selection of benchmark tools and data to help you choose the right processor, for your computing needs. 8 x 3.6GHz vs 8 x 3.1GHz Intel Core i9-9900がAMD Ryzen 7 3700Xよりも優れている理由は何ですか？0.6GHz、より高いターボ For example the MSI B450 Tomahawk Max costs $115 and supports the Ryzen 9 3950X, whereas the cheapest Z490 boards we’d recommend investing in cost around $190, like MSI’s Z490 Tomahawk.The Core i5-10600K shows a small performance improvement over the 8700K in the Corona Benchmark and that meant it was 7% faster than the 3600, but it's no match for the 16 threads of the 3700X, delivering over 20% more performance.In the V-Ray benchmark the 10600K was slightly faster than the R5 3600 but over 20% slower than the 3700X.Those margins change slightly at 1440p, here the 10600K was 8% faster than the 3700X and 3600, while it was only 6% behind the 10700K and 10900K.Stock the Corsair H150i Pro kept the 10600K at just 52 C and here we’re looking at a package power of just 104 watts.