Both are professional quality ranges and the fundamental differences are down to the available speeds, exposure latitude and the look of the grain structure.ILFORD PHOTO also produce specialist films outside of the PLUS and DELTA PROFESSIONAL ranges. 2008-11-03 14:44. That also means people develop strong feelings about them.
Both emulsions were fixed in Kodak Fixer for 10:00 with constant agitation.Obviously, this is not up to scientific standards, however, it is within the tolerances that I can bring to bear with the equipment available to me, and I feel that my tolerances are tight enough to use with a reasonable amount of certainty in the results.Below are the results for each item being evaluated.Here is the chart of the two emulsions.When looking at this, there’s a couple of things to remember: It’s not the actual values of each density step that matter because those will vary a bit due to variations in the the power of the strobe firing during the exposures, variations of power of the strobe firing during the scanning, and how many specks of dust and fibers there are on the emulsion in the scanned sample area, which will affect the average calculated sample value. This is done for each emulsion. Here’s how my methodology broke down: There was a several minute pre-soak at 20 degrees of the tank/emulsions to get everything up to temperature. On and On and On. […] See our other post on comparing 35mm format film Kodak Tri-X vs. Ilford HP5 35mm films […][…] Recommended film stock to try – Tri-X 400 & Ilford HP5 plus. While their emulsion is made using the same technology as HP5 and FP4, the key difference is that they contain less silver and therefore don't offer the same quality, versatility or characteristics.Kentmere films offer superb value for money and are a great starting point for students or anyone learning film photography, before stepping up to ILFORD films.Sign up and join our analogue community today.We want you to know exactly how our service works and what happens to your data. I've had similar impressions comparing HP5+ against Delta 400, and Tri-X against T-Max 400 - although the current version of Tri-X seems closer now to TMY than the older Tri-X … The majority of our films break down into 2 distinct lines: The PLUS films (FP4 PLUS, HP5 PLUS and PAN F PLUS,) and the DELTA PROFESSIONAL films (DELTA 100, DELTA 400 and DELTA 3200).DELTA PROFESSIONAL films use the latest film emulsion technology which give them the advantage of a lower grain to speed ratio. This will give us a good idea of the density level of the emulsion for a given exposure value.This is done exactly the same way for each emulsion. Are they the same?
Having shot a roll in medium format in our previous We know from shooting FP4 before, that it is a really sharp film with loads of contrast. These films sit alongside and benefit from the same rigorous production and quality control processes as all ILFORD PHOTO films. All comparisons were shot at box speed with the same settings and lighting.We highly recommend both the Tri-X and HP5 and would encourage you to pick up rolls each to see what you think. I’ll let the image below speak for itself.
I've always been happy with it, but am wanting to add HP5 to my repetoire. Ilford FP4 125 is the benchmark when it comes to low-speed black and white film. These have unique characteristics that differentiate them from the others.Another feature unique to XP2 SUPER is the ability to shoot different speeds between ISO 50 and 800 on the same roll and still process as standard. When metering, it’s best to err towards overexposure as opposed to underexposure, giving pleasant tones, beautiful whites and blacks without over empathizing the grain. The end result will be close enough that you can’t tell the difference.We are going to evaluate the two emulsions on two criteria: Tonal range, and granularity.To evaluate the tonal range, we’ll shoot an 18% grey card on each emulsion, and shoot it from 7 stops under to 11 stops over normal exposure in full stop increments with a studio strobe. I Push process Ilford FP4 to 800 ISO in rodinal for 35 minuets. When you consider it is one of the most affordable black and white films we sell as well, it really is a must-try. just my opinion!Correction: Most of Irving Penn’s 2 1/4 tri-x for “Worlds in a small room”, were developed in UFG.I used UFG for a while in the 70s, trying to get Panatomic-sized grain at ASA 400. You can choose Delivery or Click + Collect at the checkout. The Darkroom… Lots of experience and lots of love! Want to see great TX work? Kodak vs. Ilford - Film ranges Discussion in 'B&W: Film, Paper, Chemistry ... Plus-X = FP4+ Tri-X = HP5+ Delta 100 = T-Max 100 Delta 400 = T-max 400 Delta 3200 = T-Max 3200 The two first are traditional films, and the rest are tabular grain films. and Canonet QL17 GIII with the Kodak Tri-X 400 and Ilford HP5 400 filmLike HP 5…usually get better results. From Ilford's website: "The liberating speed of DELTA 400 PROFESSIONAL allows fast action to be frozen, great depth of field, excellent results in low lighting conditions, the freedom of a handheld camera and yet still provides the fine grain and level of detail normally associated with ISO 100 films." If you’re shooting in contrasty light, consider shooting the HP5 for subtler tones.